Hul vs P&G

globose schema Advisors. . . Challenging boundaries and beyond February 19, 2006 Unilever Unilever House, Blackfriars London EC4P 4BQ, get together Kingdom direct Via Electronic Mail RE: escapism analysis Ladies and Gentlemen: At the request of the notice of Directors of Unilever, we provide herein our analytic thinking of the Personal Products Industry and a strategy analysis of both Unilever and its biggest competitor, Procter & hazard. The enclosed analysis in any shimmy provides recommendations for Unilever to improve its competitive advantage. Respect righty submitted, GSA Procter & Gamble, Unilever and the Personal Products Industry world-wide Strategy Advisors Lee Ann Graul, Sherry Henricks, Steve Olp and Charlene Strohecker University of Maryland, University College AMBA 607 February 19, 2006 Table of Contents 1. Executive outline i 2. Industry Analysis-Personal Products Industry 1 a. Introduction 1 b. In dustry Defined 1 c. diachronic Data Analysis 2 d. Major adversarys 3 e. Trends and Industry Outlook 3 f. 5 Strategic Challenges and Opportunities g. Industry Conclusions 3. Procter & Gamble and Unilever 5 6 a. Competitor Analysis: P&G 6 b. Competitor Analysis: Unilever 8 c. Strategy P&G 10 i. Business take 10 ii. Global 11 iii. E-Business 13 iv.

Corporate 14 d. Strategy: Unilever 15 i. Business Level 15 ii. Global 16 iii. E-business 17 iv. Corporate 19 e. Conclusions and Recommendations 4. Appendices 20 22 A. SIC codification 2844 and Ind! ustry exposition 22 B. Global Personal Products Industry, Market Segmentation 24 C. Personal Products Industry, quintuplet Force Analysis 25 D. Global Personal Products Industry, Market Share 30 E. Market harvest-time 31 F. manufacturer Price Index (PPI) for SIC 2844 32 G. Industry crop Rate-Sales 33 H. fair Revenue Growth: Industry 34 I....If you want to get a broad essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper